The film that started of my love of cinema and ambition to one day make movies for a living was Inception, the mind-bending action flick from US-based Brit Christopher Nolan. Having watched nearly all of his films bar Insomnia, which I've heard is his worst, I'm pretty much settled on the fact
that Nolan is my favourite writer/director, and so it seems fitting that he'd be a perfect choice for my arts hero. His films are thrilling enough for mainstream appeal and box office success, yet still manage captivate the cult following he's had since warped thriller Memento. I love the fact that he strives to do most special effects in-camera, and that he's one of the few filmmakers to only work with film rather than succumb to the digital era.

Nolan's interest in film started when he was very young. At the SBIFF in 2011, he told of his first experience with a camera - like most, with his dad's Super 8mm. Christopher and his brother Jonathan (who he now co-writes with on most of his films) would make Lego stop-motion animations, inspired by 70s epics like Star Wars. Having created a few surrealist shorts during his time at UCL, a university that Nolan chose specifically for it's filmmaking equipment, he saved up enough money and had made enough contacts with actors to put life into a feature film project, called Following. Following is Nolan's first film and follows (no pun intended) the exploits of an aspiring writer as he meets a burglar and a mysterious woman after stalking strangers to gain
writing material. Nolan was inspired by ultra low-budget American films and shot Following on a shoestring of £3,000, filming at weekends over the course of a year. This philosophy of being frugal yet effective is something that I really admire about Nolan's entry into cinema, and is hopefully a model from which I can learn from.

The next step for Nolan was in the indie niche of NewmarketFilms, who would go on to release cult classics like Donnie Darko. At first, Nolan's second film Memento - based on a short story written by his brother - struggled to find distributers, but when it did, the memory-based thriller told in reverse chronology became very successful. It received two Oscar nominations, and a Golden Globe nomination for Best Screenplay. It was also his first collaboration with Director of Photography Wally Pfister, whom he would go on to work with for all of his other films. On his next one, Insomnia, Chris and his DP worked hard on the way it was shot due to the location, Alaska, where the sun never sets. This was another triumph for Nolan, yet by far not his greatest.

Many people consider the reboot of the Batman franchise to be the director's best work yet. With a clear focus on Bruce Wayne's fractured psyche and the most realistic portrayal of any superhero yet, the 'Dark Knight Trilogy' was a phenomenal success. 2006's Batman Begins showed us the turmoils of coping with loss, finding out the meaning of justice and the most badass Batman audiences had ever seen. 2008's The Dark Knight was a delve into fast-paced city set action flicks like Heat, and is my personal favourite of the trilogy. Last year's The Dark Knight Rises proved how good a filmmaker Nolan really is - he can pull off an outstanding comic book trilogy without any faults.
 
In between these films, Nolan revealed The Prestige, a 19thCentury set mystery drama. It featured an eclectic cast from regulars Christian Bale and Michael Caine, plus newcomers Scarlett Johansson, Hugh Jackman, Andy Serkis and David Bowie. It's a great, intriguing film with twists and turns along the way. Though (in my opinion), it isn't a patch on Inception. Released in July 2010, it's an out and out summer blockbuster, but one that has arthouse appeal and doesn't treat the audience patronisingly. Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, (you guessed it) Michael Caine and Tom Hardy (who would soon be Bane in Nolan's next feature) star in the action thriller based in the world of dreams. It attained 4 Academy Awards and was nominated for Best Picture. The King's Speech won that year, but I bet more than a few would have rather seen the Oscar go to this incredible piece of cinema.

Nolan's going to be writing and directing Interstellar, an epic sci-fi quest that's due to land some time in 2014. It sounds like it's going to be something special - but to be honest, even if he was doing a romantic comedy, I'd be the first in line to see it.


Ciaran McGhee
4/4/2013 05:34:01 am

This was a good read. What you said about being 'frugal yet effective' reminded me of Danny Boyle, another Brit director who found success overseas. In fact, his most recent film, 'Trance,' which reminded me of 'Inception' in how it explores the human psyche, seemed to follow exactly that philosophy. Do you think that there can ever be benefits to a lower budget?

Also, I think it's interesting that you said that 'The Dark Knight Rises' was 'without fault' because a lot of people would disagree with you, how would you rebutt the criticisms raised by it's detractors?

Reply
Sam Steele
5/4/2013 01:18:00 am

I think that there are some great benefits to working with a lower budget. It makes sure the money is only spent on absolutely essential things, which perhaps makes a film more focused. It could also prevent style over substance, which could detract from the story and overall meaning of the film. A lower budget opens up the opportunity of filmmaking to a wider range of people, hence bringing forward a wider range of ideas and talent. When I was talking about The Dark Knight Rises as a film without fault, what I was trying to get across is that a lot of directors struggle with the third film in a franchise or series. No film is perfect - and that includes TDKR - but I was emphasising Nolan's success with the trilogy as a whole.
By the way, I saw Trance the other day and I though it was brilliant! What did you make of it? Like you I thought of Inception and I suppose Trance could be considered as a companion film to it. It reminded me a lot of Shallow Grave, Danny Boyle's first film - have you seen any of his earlier works, like Trainspotting?

Reply
Ciaran McGhee
7/4/2013 05:16:27 am

Unfortunately I have somehow managed to have not seen any of Danny Boyle's other films, but an interview between him and Mark Kermode that I saw on TV has certainly made me want to!

As for Trance, I enjoyed it, and believe it's definitely comparable to Inception in terms of themes and characters, but I wouldn't consider it to be on the same quality level. Trance didn't have the same level of thought-provoking or intrigue, which considering how thought-provoking and intriguing it was, is another testament to Christopher Nolan!

I also remembered something else about the possibilities of a lower budget that Danny Boyle had said on the radio; that the more money you get from the studios, the more control they want over the movie. I can tell you have a genuine interest in a future in filmmaking, so if you were to find yourself making mainstream movies, to what degree would you be prepared to let executives interfere with your designs? What do you think of the studio system in general?

Reply
Sam Steele
7/4/2013 05:54:03 am

I think I saw that interview too - out of all his films, I think that Trainspotting is the one that most demands a watch. I agree with you on Trance, and yes, it isn't on the same quality level. Do you reckon this could be due to it's lower budget? Personally I don't think so, but what do you think?
I guess that studio execs wanting more control over projects with a bigger budget is a given, considering that they want to protect their hefty investments. During a Film Academy session, a lady from the BBFC was talking to us about how most big budget films want a 12A certificate, as that will gain them the biggest market. Interestingly, Inception was a 12A and Trance was a 15, which I suppose says quite a bit about studio control.
I would like to hope that even if I manage to break into the industry, I would have a good relationship with studios. I think that sometimes studios need to be interfering. After all, they may have more experience in the business than a first-time director. However hopefully the studios wouldn't restrain my ideas too much! As for the studio system itself, it has it's benefits and drawbacks. It can provide us with quality content, and studios like Film 4 can promote newcomers to cinema like Danny Boyle back in the '90s. Although sometimes their push for mainstream entertainment can lead to a loss of quality and most importantly, imagination. Thankfully, I don't think this has happened to Nolan yet, though I did feel it a little on The Dark Knight Rises. What are your thoughts on studios and their purpose in film making? :)

Ciaran McGhee
8/4/2013 08:31:26 am

Well first if all one thing that Inception has that Trance doesn't is the element of spectacle (e.g. the flood at the beginning, the iconic folding street,) that a bigger budget affords. I'm not saying that bigger budget = better special effects = better movie, but films are a visual medium and I do enjoy visually dynamic sequences like that.

As for the studio system, I agree that it has brought about some great films, and I'll disagree with anyone who writes off a film simply because it's popular or contemporary. However I've read about some of the shady behind the scenes stuff that threatens to stifle creativity like buying scripts and not doing anything with them; 
http://www.moviemaker.com/directing/article/hollywoods_homeless_screenplays_3242/.
And then there are pervasive issues with the movies themselves;
http://www.cracked.com/article_19549_5-old-timey-prejudices-that-still-show-up-in-every-movie.html
which are problems that the mainstream movie industry really needs to fix. 

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    arts hero

    My task was to find out about someone who inspires your love of the arts. 

    All factual information is sourced from IMDB, Wikipedia, Empire Magazine and Nolan's interview upon receiving the SBIFF's Modern Master Award.(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MF3iPmSgGE)